The #1 blog of International Village Condominium Association in Inverrary, Fla., keeping unit owners informed about important issues affecting the community

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Vote for change!

By now, most of you have received your ballot package for the Jan. 27 International Village Board of Directors election, or you should be receiving it soon.

As I stated in my last blog post, the choice couldn't be any clearer in this election. All three incumbent Board members running for reelection (Marvin Tow, Marc Richman and Sandra Best) just voted to raise your maintenance fees by 7 percent (six times the inflation rate) after rejecting any meaningful budget cuts. These same incumbent Board members also back plans for a $1.4 million special assessment based on overpriced contracts for projects that have not been carefully evaluated. And they have consistently refused to consider operational efficiencies and innovative practices to bring spending under control.

It’s clearly time for a change. And fortunately, you have the opportunity to cast your votes for four unit owners who are prepared to deliver that change.

Duv Wolff, Wendy Hernandez and Marcio Jaspan all have strong professional backgrounds and are committed to responsible spending to prevent our property values from plummeting due to the kind of runaway maintenance increases and special assessments we have seen under the current Board.  

Duv Wolff is a small business owner with a talent for minimizing unnecessary expenses, and he wants to reverse the 7 percent maintenance increase.

Wendy Hernandez has worked in the budgeting and purchasing departments of various companies and is experienced in saving money on contracts.

And Marcio Jaspan is an experienced engineer whose expertise will prove invaluable when it comes to evaluating project contracts to ensure we are getting a good deal for our money.

The following chart provides a comparison of the seven candidates on three key issues:


7% maintenance fee increase
$1.4 million special assessment
Cutting wasteful spending
Duv Wolff
OPPOSE
OPPOSE
SUPPORT
Wendy Hernandez
OPPOSE
OPPOSE
SUPPORT
Marcio Jaspan        OPPOSE          OPPOSE       SUPPORT




Marvin Tow
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
OPPOSE
Marc Richman
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
OPPOSE
Sandra Best
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
OPPOSE

The choice is clear. When it comes to runaway spending, maintenance fee increases and special assessments, enough is enough! Vote for Duv Wolff, Wendy Hernandez and Marcio Jaspan.
  
Mark your ballot and place it inside the envelope labeled “Secret Ballot.” Then place that ballot inside the Ballot Return Envelope and seal it. Print your name, address and unit number, and be sure to sign it or it will not count. (If you own more than one unit, you must repeat this process for each unit.) Then place the proper postage on the envelope and mail it in. Or if you plan to be in International Village on Monday, Jan. 27, you can deliver it in person at the clubhouse main card room (movie room), as long as you arrive before 7 p.m. when the counting begins. You can also have someone (like me) bring your ballot in for you.

You do not need to complete the “Voting Certificate” included in your packet if you are already the designated voting representative on record with the association. (Call the office at 954-484-9106 if you are not sure.) Only fill it out if you need to change the designated voting representative and then place it in the outer envelope. (Do not place it in the “Secret Ballot” envelope.)

Feel free to email me if you have any questions!

Friday, December 20, 2013

Maintenance hike frames election choice

Nothing could more clearly illustrate the stark choice facing unit owners in next month’s Board of Directors election than this past Tuesday’s budget meeting. (See 12/17/13 video HERE.) From the moment the meeting began, it was clear that the current Board majority had no interest in making any meaningful cuts to the budget to avoid saddling unit owners with another significant maintenance fee increase. That big-spending majority includes all three Board members who are running for reelection next month – Board President Marvin Tow, Board Treasurer Marc Richman and Board member Sandy Best.

Despite my pre-meeting challenge to Mr. Tow, Mr. Richman and our property manager to cut the proposed budget before it came before us at the meeting, we were presented with the same exact $3.5 million budget document.

Board member Jerry Mirrow (who sadly has decided not to run for reelection) and I did the best we could to trim the budget by making a series of motions to cut spending on various line items, but virtually all of them were rejected – including Jerry’s motion to cut the litigation budget and my motions to reduce the painting and social activities budgets and stop paying for the Board of Directors President's $1,350-per-year cell phone. The majority’s only concession was to reduce the proposed increase in employee salaries from over 3% to 2% (for a total savings of $10,000) after a number of owners complained they haven’t gotten a raise in years.

But the handwriting on the wall was clear when one Board member emphatically expressed her impatience with the process of going through the two-page budget line by line (which I guess would have meant missing the finale of The Voice). Faced with the Board majority’s obvious rush to get through the meeting, Jerry proposed sending the budget back to management with a directive to reduce overall spending by 4%, but that would have required Mr. Tow and Vice President Collette Goslin to withdraw their original motion to approve the budget, which they refused to do.

The end result is that maintenance fees will go up 7.1%, about six times the current U.S. inflation rate. (See the final approved budget and maintenance fee breakdown HERE.) Beginning in January, the owner of an average one-bedroom unit currently paying $282 in monthly maintenance will pay $302 a month, while the owner of an average two-bedroom unit who is now paying $393 monthly will pay $421 per month in maintenance. This raw deal for unit owners was approved by a 5-2 vote, with Jerry and I voting no.

I believe we owe it to unit owners to be more sensitive about how we spend their money so they don’t have to keep paying more and more to live here.

Fortunately, you will have a chance next month to change the direction of International Village and replace the current Board majority with candidates who are committed to actually saving unit owners’ money by restraining spending. I will be reaching out to these candidates over the next days and weeks to bring you the facts about their ideas and platforms so you can make an informed choice. Stay tuned.

In the meantime, I would like to wish everyone a merry Christmas. If you happen to be in town, our social activities chairman John Henderson is organizing a Christmas party on Sunday, Dec. 22 from 5-9 p.m. in the clubhouse with music, dancing and cake.

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

One battle is won; the main battle lies ahead!

My hats off once more to the wonderful owners at International Village for again saving the day by responding to my call to protest the $1.4 million special assessment plan that was to be approved on Monday. You didn't let me down. You emailed the Board in droves and showed up in impressive numbers at Monday's Board meeting, and the Board wisely backed down. 

As you recall, I had pledged to make a motion to table (postpone) this outrageously timed plan until after the election. But before I could say the word “table,” our Board Vice President Collette Goslin had beat me to it, and I was reduced to only seconding her motion!! Then, without a word of discussion, the roll was called, and one by one all six Board members present voted “Yes” to table it. It’s something you really have to see to believe, so check out the 12/16/13 video HERE. (The scene comes toward the end of the meeting.)

Why the stunning turnaround only a day after at least one Board member was still strenuously defending the special assessment? It was you! You made your voices heard – logically, forcefully, and yes in some cases quite passionately – and it had an impact. Most of the Board is up for reelection next month, and they apparently don’t want to face that kind of wrath at the ballot box.

But there’s no time to bask in the glow of victory, because the main battle is now upon us. Tonight (Tuesday, Dec. 17 at 7 p.m.), the Board will take up the proposed 2014 budget, which if approved without cuts will result in a 7.4 percent maintenance fee increase for all owners.

I call once more upon our property manager, working with our Board president and Treasurer, to identify a set of cuts before tonight’s meeting to eliminate the need for any maintenance fee increase next year. They are welcome to use my proposed cuts as a template, but by no means should they feel a need to limit their cost-cutting strategies to those areas. Out of a budget of approximately $3.5 million, I am confident in their ability to find the necessary $159,000 in savings. In return, as I stated before, I pledge to support the proposed 4 percent salary increase for employees, because they’ll be earning it by stretching our dollars.

However, if the budget is not reduced 7.4 percent before it comes to us tonight for a vote, I will be forced to make a motion to eliminate the proposed pay raises from the budget – thus saving $30,000 – because I cannot in good conscience support a salary increase at the same time owners are being asked to sacrifice another 7 percent out of their own paychecks to pay for maintenance.

I believe this is a fair solution that rewards employees for being innovative and learning to do more with a little less, while at the same time giving hard-working owners a well-deserved break from ever-rising fees and assessments at International Village.

But it’s up to you to make it happen by speaking up again. Many of you have already written the Board about this, but I encourage you to email them again HERE all the way up to the time of the budget meeting, because you've proven you can make a difference. And show up in force again at tonight's meeting, because you certainly make an impressive crowd.

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Ready for another $1.4 million special assessment?


Just in case you thought this past year’s $1.3 million special assessment (and 18.5 percent maintenance increase) wasn't enough, the International Village Board of Directors has a nice Grinch-style surprise for you tomorrow, just in time for Christmas and just weeks before the next Board election: a $1.4 million “Part 2” special assessment (under the vaguely worded agenda item of "Project Re-organization").

Although I warned you about this in a recent blog post, I’m still in shock at the sheer brazenness of it, coming so close to the election and just one day before a budget meeting designed to raise your maintenance fees by 7.4 percent. Obviously, this Board is in a big hurry to PICK your pockets before you hopefully KICK them out of office. But by then, if they get their way, you’ll be in the poorhouse and your foreclosed unit will be available for them to snatch up for a song and flip for megabucks (as our vulture-like immediate past Board president from Quebec was so adept at).

To add insult to injury, the $1.4 million special assessment package we’ll be considering on Monday (Dec. 16 at 7 p.m. in the clubhouse) includes $75,000 for a camera surveillance project despite a recent ruling by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation that forced Board President Marvin Tow’s $150,000 camera scheme to be put on hold. I guess we’re supposed to be grateful that the revised plan calls for only 88 cameras instead of the 286 originally proposed, but it still happens to be illegal.


Other projects on the special assessment list:

  • $150,000 for balcony repairs
  • $390,000 for building renovations (for those buildings that weren't renovated)
  • $300,000 to replace the Nottingham roof
  • $200,000 for painting the exteriors of the buildings (which don't appear to need it)
  • $80,000 for roadway resealing
  • $160,000 for an electronic key building access system (to go along with the maximum-security scheme I discussed in my last blog post).

The entire plan, if approved, will require a special assessment of approximately $1,500 for a one-bedroom unit and $2,000 for a two-bedroom unit. But the Board would have to meet again to structure the special assessment in terms of the number of payments based on whether bank financing can be obtained. 

Our association attorney is still “investigating” whether we “really need” to give the mailed 14-day notice of intent to special assess required under Florida law before an assessment is actually imposed, since the previous Board in September 2012 already approved both Parts 1 and 2 of the special assessment but postponed Part 2 the following week.

There's no question in my mind that such a notice is required, not only because the first notice is now well over a year old and many owners have come and gone since then, but because the plan itself changed. The last four projects listed above weren't even included in the original list approved last year. So if the Board approves the revised list on Monday, I expect the notice of intent to special assess will have to be included in the Board of Directors election ballot package that will be mailed to all unit owners around the end of this month. That will give this Board just enough time to impose the new special assessment before its term expires on Jan. 27, 2014. So now you understand the rush.

It’s the height of arrogance for this Board to take such consequential action just before its term runs out. It amounts to attempting to tie the hands of the next Board before it even takes office. Common sense dictates that this special assessment proposal should be an issue for the campaign as owners make up their minds whom to vote for based on their position on this question. That’s what elections are for. So in the spirit of democracy, I plan to make a motion to table (postpone) this preposterously timed item until after the Jan. 27 election. If you agree with me, please let the Board know by emailing them HERE, and be sure to come to this Monday night’s meeting (and Tuesday night's budget meeting as well). It's time to stand up and say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

Thursday, December 12, 2013

My alternative budget to avoid a maintenance increase

It has been brought to my attention that a number of unit owners have not yet turned in their budget proxies. It is critical that owners submit their proxies as soon as possible. To avoid a maintenance fee increase of 30 percent or more, you must vote “Yes” to waive reserves and send in your proxy in time for it to be received by the association by the Dec. 17 deadline, which is the date of our budget meeting. Some of you have told me you misplaced your proxy or never received it. No problem. Click HERE to download and print one. Others have asked me for specific instructions on how to complete it, so here goes: 

Fill out the very top part where it asks you for your unit number and building. Leave the line just below that blank; the board secretary will act as proxy and is required by law to cast your proxy form as you filled it out. Just make sure you check "Yes," date it, sign where it says "Signature of voting representative" and print your name below that, and leave everything else blank, including the "Substitution of proxyholder" part at the bottom. (If you have more than one unit, fill out as many proxies as you have units.) 

You can bring the proxy to the office in person, fax it or scan and email it. You could also mail it in, but considering that the proxy must be received by Dec. 17, it might be safer to use one of the other methods.

To email it, just scan the completed form and send it as a PDF or jpeg attachment to admin@internvillage.com and include the word “Proxy" in the subject line.

To fax it, send it to 954-486-5677.


MY BUDGET PROPOSAL

As for the budget itself, I have taken the time to review the proposed 2014 budget, with some help from a fellow unit owner, in advance of our Dec. 17 budget meeting, and I am now confident we can cut the $159,000 needed in savings to avoid a 7.4 percent maintenance increase. 

First off, let me state that our employees are greatly appreciated for their hard work and dedicated
service to International Village, but I cannot in good conscience support the proposed 4 percent salary increase at the same time the budget is asking already struggling owners to pay 7 percent more in maintenance (which happens to be about seven times the current rate of inflation). Let’s keep in mind that our employees are already going to get a substantial increase in health insurance benefits as a result of Obamacare mandates, which will require us to spend an extra $16,000 in health benefits next year. That’s the equivalent of a raise in my book. So why would we add another $30,000 salary increase on top of that, just because it represents the same 4 percent raise that was given last year? In this economy, how many of us can expect an automatic 4 percent raise every year? Salary increases and bonuses have their place, but they should be tied to performance using defined benchmarks such as, say, success in balancing the budget without raising fees. Here's the deal: I pledge to support this proposed 4 percent salary increase for all employees if our property manager presents the Board with a budget that doesn't include a maintenance increase at our budget meeting this coming Tuesday. Of course, this will require coming up with the $159,000 in savings I mentioned earlier. To make this task a little easier, I took the liberty of identifying some savings in the budget myself, and have come up with the following proposed cuts, which add up to exactly the amount of savings we need. 

1. Legal fees – Save $25,000 by engaging in less unnecessary litigation, which often seems driven by Board members’ personal animosities.
2. Computer expenses – Why are we budgeting $15,000 for such a tiny operation? Save $7,500.
3. Office equipment and supplies – Again, for such a small office, the proposed $15,400 sounds exorbitant. Save $8,000 by shopping at Walmart.
4. “Other expenses” – This very vague line item is budgeted at $10,000. Unless we can get a better definition of at least what general category of expenses we are talking about here, I would eliminate this item altogether.
5. Signage – Why is $2,500 budgeted for signage when less than $200 was spent in 2013? Save $2,300.
6. Cell phones – There is no justification for spending $1,350 for the Board of Directors president’s cell phone when all other Board members pay for their own. I have no problem letting the three other individuals with association-paid cell phones keep them since they are employees and need them for their jobs, but there are cell phone plans for $50 a month – less than half of what we’re paying now. Save $3,600. 
7. Cable – Eliminate premium channels like Showtime (trash time). I don’t know how much this will save, but let’s say $35,000 (about 10 percent of the annual price of the contract).
8. There appears to be some redundancy in the budget. We have an air conditioning contract, a landscape contract and a pest control contract, which are costing us a total of $66,540. But in a separate part of the budget, a total of $60,000 is set aside in maintenance costs for air conditioning, landscaping and pest control. Why are we paying twice for the same things? We don’t seem to be getting our money’s worth on these contracts. Let’s rebid them to make sure our contractors do more so we don’t have to do so much. Save $30,000.
9. Copier lease – Why are we spending $4,500 a year on this? Wouldn't it be cheaper to buy a copier? Dump this expensive leased copier. Save $2,000. 
10. Water and Sewer – At $600,000, this is the single biggest line item, but maybe we could get some of it back. There has been talk of enforcing the Village’s ban on washers in units, but also of the impracticality of forcing owners with “grandfathered-in” washers to remove them. But we could turn this negative into a positive by simply acknowledging that they exist and charging these owners a fee based on their estimated increased water usage. Recover $5,000.
11. Open the clubhouse one hour later every day, at 8 a.m. instead of 7 a.m. According to our property manager, only between 3 and 10 people a day use the clubhouse between 7 and 8 a.m. anyway. This would save about $4,700.
12. Paint – Let’s cut the $6,000 budget for this item in half by stopping the practice of repainting the walkways every year. We could easily get away with painting them less often and just giving them a good sweeping. But if the paint is fading faster than it should, we need to switch paints. Save $3,000.
13. Social activities – I believe this should be mainly a volunteer initiative. In fact, this past year, volunteer owners organized several successful and very well attended parties that didn't cost the association anything. Save $4,500.   
14. Maintenance and janitorial supplies – $78,000 seems like a lot. Let’s try to make do with $65,000. Save $13,000. 
15. Gym – We just replaced all the gym equipment. So why is the budget $3,000 higher than last year's approved budget? Save $3,000.
16. Tennis and racquetball courts – Why are we spending $3,000 on these two items? Save $2,000.

There you have it. I don’t believe I have exhausted all the potential savings in the budget, but just doing the 16 items above will avoid the threatened maintenance fee increase. Let's hope our property manager and Board take heed. And be sure to attend our budget hearing this coming Tuesday, Dec. 17 at 7 p.m. in the clubhouse (as well as our regular meeting scheduled for the day before on Monday, Dec. 16 at 7 p.m.).


SECURITY SCAM
In other news, the Safety & Security Committee held its first meeting last week. (See it HERE by scrolling down the page to "Safety & Security Committee.") The committee, which was established last month by Board of Directors President Marvin Tow, had been billed as a way to solicit ideas from owners on addressing safety concerns in the Village. But the first hour or so of the meeting was devoted to a slick sales presentation by two representatives from a local security firm, who pitched several unsolicited big-ticket items including front entrance locks and a telephone entry system for each residential building, a new electronic key access system and, of course, a camera surveillance system – none of which they provided price estimates for, saying they were under strict orders by someone on the Board (the president?) not to discuss costs.

Some cynics had suspected that this committee was just designed as another vehicle for our Board president to once again push his favorite pet project (despite a recent ruling by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation that forced his $150,000 camera scheme to be put on hold). What they probably didn't see coming was an even more ambitious maximum-security plan to convert International Village into a virtual prison.


ART FESTIVAL
On a lighter note, International Village will be hosting its own mini version of Art Basel this weekend, with an Art Festival to be held this Saturday, Dec. 14 from 3 to 6 p.m. at the fountain in the “French Quarter” of the Village. Bring your art works to sell and share, bask in the beauty of this perfect gathering place, and meet and network with your neighbors while enjoying some free cake courtesy of our social activities chairman John Henderson. Musicians are welcome.


Tuesday, December 3, 2013

International Village budget package and election notice

By now, all unit owners should have received two important pieces of mail from International Village: the 2014 budget package and the notice of the Board of Directors election to be decided on Monday, Jan. 27, 2014.

First, the budget package: As I have stated previously in my blog, I disagree with some of the spending contained in the proposed $3.5 million operating budget (including $1,350 for our Board of Directors president's cell phone), and I look forward to proposing a number of cuts to bring spending down because I don't support raising maintenance another 7 percent after this past year's nearly 20 percent increase.

As for the election package, those of you planning to run for the Board of Directors must submit the enclosed Notice of Candidacy to the office by Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2013. Candidates also should submit a bio no later than Monday, Dec. 23, 2013. Ballots will then be mailed out to unit owners including the names of all the candidates as well as a number of proposed changes to our condo docs, some of which were discussed at our last Board meeting on Nov. 18. (See 11/18/13 meeting video.)

There was also discussion last month of holding a special meeting in the very near future to revisit "Part II" of last year's special assessment, which the previous Board voted to postpone in September 2012 after approving the "Part I" special assessment of $1.3 million, which was collected over four months from October 2012 to January 2013. The idea of a meeting to impose another $1.4 million special assessment just before an election is insane, and I hope it doesn't happen.

In another action last month, the Board voted to ask our association attorney to prepare a petition to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) requesting a declaratory statement to determine the legality of installing a camera surveillance system in International Village before proceeding any further with the idea. But instead of asking for a decision on the proposed system, the Board voted 6-1 (with me dissenting) to inquire about the propriety of the camera system that was installed in the Zurich building a few years ago by a committee of Zurich unit owners. A DBPR official I spoke to after the meeting told me in no uncertain terms that the petition will be denied because the agency won't issue declaratory statements on actions that have already taken place (as made clear in Finding #11 of this recent DBPR ruling). So before we spend $3,000 in legal fees so our association attorney can prepare a worthless petition, I hope the Board will reconsider its move.

Finally, the new Safety & Security Committee, which was created to discuss safety issues after the proposed camera system hit its DBPR roadblock, will hold its first meeting this Wednesday, Dec. 4 at 7 p.m. in the clubhouse small card room. If you're not too busy, I encourage you to try to make it.